From: Noel Yap (noel.yap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-07 12:35:28
On 3/7/06, Andy Little <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I guess so, except high altitude mountain climbing over the AST using copious
> supplies of oxygen might be nearer the mark than walking. As I understand it C++
> is not beloved by compiler writers for this reason! I guess it all comes down to
> the exact definition of "a C++ parser"and what you want to do with its output.
Some things I had in mind were:
- code beautification
- static dependency analysis for link- or compile-compatibility
- other static code analysis
- creation of refactoring tools
Noel