From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-24 18:14:24
"Paul Mensonides" wrote
> *But*, it still comes down to a more fundamental issue.... Should the library
> endorse the use of the types of metaprogramming constructs themselves as
> non-metatypes? I'd say it shouldn't. If you need that for 'int_<A+B>' (e.g.)
> then say 'int_<plus<int_<A>, int_<B> >::value>'
That wont work if you need to use pass the function to another function.
regards
Andy Little