From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-19 12:54:25
David Abrahams wrote:
> >> Good, but what would be needed is a sort of tri-state for each
> >> define:
> >> defined/not defined/maybe defined.
> >
> > This one is easy. Just run the tool twice, once with the
> macro defined
> > and once without.
>
> No, the combinatorics make that intractable. And you want to
> re-use common state (when two different settings of a macro
> leave you with most of the same preprocessor state).
Good point.
Regards Hartmut