From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-24 12:16:39
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Bill Buklis wrote:
>
> > Is this a bug or am I expecting it to do something that it shouldn't?
> > Does anyone know a workaround for this (at least temporarily)?
> >
> > Compiler: VC 7.1
> > boost: 1.33.0
The cvs has been updated so reverse_iterators are now defined as usual
in terms of boost::reverse_iterator< iter_type >
Thanks for the report.
-Thorsten