From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-29 14:51:48
Sebastian Redl wrote:
> David A. Greene wrote:
>
>
>>What's the best way to do this? typeof?
>>
>>
>
> One option is boost::function, but that would require a bit of
> refactoring, most likely, and would impose a runtime overhead.
Can you explain how boost::function would help here? boost::function
doesn't handle argument binding. Are you suggesting that the
Function argument to the Callback template would be a boost::function
type? I'm not as concerned about the runtime overhead at the moment
but it may become an issue later.
-Dave