From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-10 09:18:06
"Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57_at_[hidden]> writes:
> However, it would be nice to have a clean Boost library in parallel
> to the hacked to death Boost library (which is what we have now),
> and challenge implementors to support that.
Great idea! Why don't we add a simple way to make all
BOOST_WORKAROUNDs turn off? Then a scrappy group of interested
testers can start publishing no-workarounds test results.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com