From: Thomas Matelich (matelich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-05 16:02:54
If I were smart, I'd just implement an overloadable lexical_convert as
has been discussed a few times and be done with it. Not sure why I
put sooo much stock in plain Boost support. Probably out of hope that
someday, lexical_cast will be standardized. Laziness too I suppose
:).
On 12/5/05, john.wismar_at_[hidden] <john.wismar_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Thomas Matelich <matelich_at_[hidden]> wrote on 12/05/2005 12:40:34 PM:
>
> > http://listarchives.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/08/91573.php
> >
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I missed that in my search....
>
> And I agree with your comment in the linked-to email. The list of things I
> have to do to get Boost to work after each update grows longer and
> longer....
>
> --------------------------------
> John Wismar
> john.wismar_at_[hidden]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
>