From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-12 13:12:05
Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
> I'm still stunned that the range constructor is slower than Tom's
> loop. Substantially slower.
He used the profiler to time it - the input iterator's overhead is
probably exagerated by the profiling code. Turn of profiling and turn up
the optimization and the two versions should run at about the same speed.