From: Richard Hadsell (hadsell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-24 08:59:44
Caleb Epstein wrote:
>I'm not certain, but I would guess that overhead is the reason.
>Perhaps someone more closely involved in the implementation (Peter?)
>would care to comment.
>
>
As a user of scoped_ptr and scoped_array, I expressed a strong opinion
that its memory usage remain as is, and some Boost developers agreed.
If you have a way to maintain the current behavior (speed and memory
footprint) as a default, you are welcome to add functionality.
Otherwise, it becomes useless to me.
-- Dick Hadsell 914-259-6320 Fax: 914-259-6499 Reply-to: hadsell_at_[hidden] Blue Sky Studios http://www.blueskystudios.com 44 South Broadway, White Plains, NY 10601