From: James Mastro (jmastro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-09 22:02:35
Jean-François Brouillet wrote:
> Since boost is supposed to be a 100% header file solution, the rationale for "building it" somehow
> eludes me ...
Some boost libraries do need to be built because they aren't just
headers. If you only use header-only boost libs, like the smart
pointers, then you can get away without building boost.
-jim