From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-08 18:26:07
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:019001c5242b$3e480c70$6501a8c0_at_pdimov2...
>> adl_ as a prefix doesn't
>> save you from colliding with another ADL customization point, if your
>> convention catches on.
>
> no, but is that relevant?
Probably not, if you're only interested in avoiding g++ specific collisions
with mpl::begin.