From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-07 11:47:25
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> It is actually not _that_ unreasonable to put ADL customization point
>> defaults in the global namespace and dispense with the "using" idiom.
>> Moderately unreasonable, maybe. :-)
>
> I'm interested in why you say that. After all, the likelihood of
> collision is infinitesimal, right? ;-)
No, as we know, the likelihood of collision when nonfunctions are considered
is real.