From: Patrick Mézard (pmezard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-03 02:53:42
Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental <at> thomson.com> writes:
> Why do you need unnamed namespace? Remove it and it will all work.
The type being tested belongs to a library. I do not need the operator<< at the
library level, only in the test for BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL support. So I define the
operator at in the test scope, in an anonymous namespace because there is no
need to export the symbol. That's good practice for me, maybe I am wrong ?
Patrick Mézard