From: gast128 (gast128_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-08 04:28:12
> I think its utility and purpose are under appreciated. But it really needs
> to be worked on some more to make a case for promoting it into more boost
> usage.
Not by us! I really promote this strong typedef in our team. I even think this
should be in the c++ standard. Something like the normal typedef, but also
something like the strong_typedef.
But perhaps you can have a look at the article: 'True typedefs' from Matthew
Wilson (C++ Users Journal march 2003).
Wkr,
me