From: Martin Slater (mslater_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-23 16:13:58


Robert Ramey wrote:

>I can't see why this would require a new archive type
>
>
>

Now that would be perfect if I did not need a new archive type, I'm
having trouble envisioning how it would work without one though. Any
chance you could explain a bit more?

thanks

Martin