From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 20:09:29
Richard Hadsell wrote:
> Jeffrey Holle wrote:
>
>> Its because the State object is held by reference.
>> The const parameter forces the grammar object to be stateless. This
>> is by design.
>
>
> (I'm new to this, too.) If the grammar object is stateless, how was I
> able to add a closure to it? Or is it just the base class (grammar)
> part of it that has to be stateless?
I almost missed this thread. I'd suggest you continue this thread
in Spirit's mailing list:
Spirit-general_at_[hidden]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spirit-general
It's the proper venue.
Thanks,
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net