From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-21 12:16:08
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
>> why would you want such a thing?
>
> Typically, in order to let generic code that needs a default constructor to
> work unmodified on date/time values.
Is there much generic code out there that works only on default
constructible objects whose other concept requirements are satisfied
by dates?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com