From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-06 04:42:02
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I am always in favor of
>> designs which are clear and understandable over all other considerations.
>
> And what's so un-understantable about boost::path which has both narrow and
> wide methods?
I'm finding it hard to argue with that idea.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com