From: Angus Leeming (angus.leeming_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-04 22:09:02
Angus Leeming wrote:
Apologies for replying to my own mail, but I've made some progress.
The attached code allows me to do all I would like to do, although it
is more ugly than I would like.
Specifically, the compiler errors caused by the existence of two node
functions:
class FEM {
Node & node(size_type i);
Node const & node(size-type i) const;
};
Can be overcome if I wrap an FEM variable up inside a struct:
class nodeGetter {
FEM & fem_;
public:
nodeGetter(FEM & fem) : fem_(fem) {}
Node & node operator()(size_type i) { return fem_.node(i); }
};
It works, but it's nasty :-(
I'd welcome any and all insights and would just love to get rid of
this nastiness.
Angus