From: Anthony Kolarik (a.kolarik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-01-31 12:37:24
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 20:22:32 -0500 (EST)
> From: Jeremy Siek <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: RE: RE: Dependencies for tokenizer?
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Jeff Garland wrote:
> jeff>
> jeff> I'm sure there is. It is a matter of getting the "25 lines of
> jeff> actual code" (my guess) in those 47 headers that tokenizer
> jeff> really needs into a small header. I'm sure with a small
> jeff> effort you could do it. Perhaps you could even find a way to
> jeff> improve the overall design in the process.
>
> Well, it could get a little messy. The iterator adaptors use
> some stuff
> from the type_traits headers, which have lots of workarounds
> for different
> compilers, etc., etc.
>
> For a super simple C++ stringtok see the header
>
> boost/pending/stringtok.hpp
>
> It's not an official boost library, but you might find it fits
> your needs.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
Thank you for pointing out the pitfalls of reworking tokenizer and for
pointing out boost/pending/stringtok.hpp, it serves fine for my purposes.
-- Tony K.