From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-12-14 16:52:09
On 12/14/01 1:40 PM, "Louis Lavery" <Louis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Yes, I see that, but I can't see what's wrong with using the
> test "if ( px != rpx )".
>
> Or, to put it another way, if px == rpx == 0 who cares whether
> pn equals rpn or not?
Oops, my last message was a mistake. I don't know the answer.
-- Darin