From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-19 13:36:40
"Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> writes:
> The idea is to require calling of the derived base class rather and
> trap attempts to violate this constraint.
"derived base class?"
"rather and trap?"
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com