From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-22 09:07:54
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> And while gcc-2.95.3 itself may still be important to a few
> users, I'd really be surprise if more than one or two users care about the
> gcc-2.95.3-stlport combination.
I think it's very likely that users of old compilers are also using
STLPort in order to get around some of their vendor's standard library
deficiencies.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com