Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r61332 - trunk/libs/config/test
From: nielsdekker_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-04-17 04:38:03
Author: niels_dekker
Date: 2010-04-17 04:38:01 EDT (Sat, 17 Apr 2010)
New Revision: 61332
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/61332
Log:
Avoided IBM/XL warning about omitted keyword "private" for base class "int_struct". Added note about IBM/XL V10.1 regression failure.
Text files modified:
trunk/libs/config/test/boost_no_com_value_init.ipp | 9 +++++++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Modified: trunk/libs/config/test/boost_no_com_value_init.ipp
==============================================================================
--- trunk/libs/config/test/boost_no_com_value_init.ipp (original)
+++ trunk/libs/config/test/boost_no_com_value_init.ipp 2010-04-17 04:38:01 EDT (Sat, 17 Apr 2010)
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
// Note: its base class, int_struct, is there to try to reproduce GCC Bug 30111,
// "Value-initialization of POD base class doesn't initialize members", reported
// by Jonathan Wakely in 2006: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111
- class value_initializer: int_struct
+ class value_initializer: private int_struct
{
private:
enum_holder m_enum_holder;
@@ -596,6 +596,11 @@
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(derived_int_struct()) +
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(char_array_struct()) +
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(int_array_pair()) +
+ // IBM's XL V10.1.0.0 may fail to value-initialize a temporary of a non-POD
+ // type like enum_holder_and_int, virtual_destructor_holder, or non_pod_class,
+ // as appeared at the Boost Config/trunk regression page in April 2010.
+ // Michael Wong (IBM Canada Ltd) confirmed the issue to me (Niels Dekker, LKEB),
+ // and gave it high priority.
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(enum_holder_and_int()) +
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(private_and_protected_int()) +
// The following line, doing user_defined_destructor_holder(), causes
@@ -681,7 +686,7 @@
<< num_failures_on_heap << '+'
<< num_failures_of_temporaries << "): "
<< total_num_failures
- << "\nDetected by boost_no_complete_value_initialization::test() revision 15."
+ << "\nDetected by boost_no_complete_value_initialization::test() revision 16."
<< std::endl;
}
return static_cast<int>(total_num_failures);