From: hinnant_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-12-09 11:31:29
Author: hinnant
Date: 2007-12-09 11:31:29 EST (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 41923
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/41923
Log:
Checked off Pete issue 28.
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html 2007-12-09 11:31:29 EST (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
<i>Added the usual boilerplate wording to the front matter for the clause.
Ditto date-time clause, which was also missing the boilerplate.</i><br>
</li>
- <li>condition_variable::timed_wait: the requirement that the function return
+ <li>✔ condition_variable::timed_wait: the requirement that the function return
false if the time elapses means that when a blocked thread is released by
notify, the release code must check whether the time has elapsed, since the
timeout may not have been noticed earlier. Is this intentional? Seems more