Subject: Re: [Boost-build] pathscale pathf77?
From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-04 14:48:00
On Feb 4, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Spencer E. Olson wrote:
> The version of pathscale that I have access to is 3.2 and there
> doesn't seem
> to be a pathf77 executable. The man pages do not reference it, and
> there is
> also not a -f77 option that specifies that the code is fortran 77.
> Rather,
> the man pages indicate that pathscale only recognizes the
> difference between
> free form and fixed form fortran instead of F77 vs F90 vs F95.
>
> Does anyone have an available installation that differs from this?
Our installation looks the same (pathf90 no pathf77).
> If not, I'll submit another small patch for changing this to using
> pathf90 to compile
> f77 code--I've tested it and it appears to work well enough.
Good by me, thanks!
-- Noel