From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-04 13:12:01
on Mon Dec 03 2007, Vladimir Prus <ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:
>> Or you could just not represent the feature when it has its default
>> value, just as feature relevance worked in BBv1.
>
> You surely meant something else, as a feature that has its default value
> is *not* represented now. And "feature relevance" as I understand it
> is something else.
No, you're right; I was just confused, sorry. Maybe per-project
settings should change what is considered the default value for the
purposes of target path construction.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com