From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-19 01:17:42
"Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:200710190913.33825.ghost_at_cs.msu.su...
> On Friday 19 October 2007 06:11:14 Rene Rivera wrote:
>
>> >>> for consistency, since I run bjam wrapped into script.
>> >> I guess you could use the "all" target, IIRC.
>> >
>> > Nope. both all and test produce:
>> >
>> > "don't know how to make ..."
>>
>> Well the only other alternative I can think of is to add an alias for
>> the targets.
>
> To build all targets in current Jamfile it's possible to do:
>
> bjam .
What if I do not want all targets (there may be potentially some auxiliary
targets), but only related to unit testing? Why can't we have test target as
we used to have?
Gennadiy