From: Konstantin Litvinenko (Konstantin.Litvinenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-18 03:05:27
Hello, David!
You wrote on Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:54:10 +0100:
VP>>> Comments?
??>>
??>> I don't like Devid's way, but really like your's one. Current
??>> Boost.Build behaviour is fail to build if requirements not fully
??>> matched.
DA> That is *not* the current behavior when there's only one alternative.
Then we need fix only this exceptional case :) I didn't traped on it
because I always write <theading>multi and <link>shared in top level
targets....
With best regards, Konstantin Litvinenko.