From: Johan Nilsson (r.johan.nilsson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-30 03:02:42
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 January 2006 11:21, Johan Nilsson wrote:
>>
>>> Some related questions:
>>>
>>> 1) Is is possible to tell SHELL not to capture output, and simply
>>> echo it to the console as it goes? For my specific situation the
>>> output could get really huge when many things have changed since
>>> last update, or the first time the scripts are run.
>>
>> I don't know. Anyone?
>
> No, seeing as the whole point of SHELL is to capture the output ;-)
> ...Why not use a regular action at instead?
Because I'm dense ... ?
// Johan