From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-27 09:06:12
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 17:56, fs_kazike wrote:
> I was very surprised that the return did not exit the rule and the for
> continued.
> Is this behavior intended or a bug ?
That was the behavior of Perforce Jam by the time Boost.Jam was forked.
Perforce fixed that "feature" since then, but the change was never ported to
Boost.Jam. Primarily for lack of time.
- Volodya
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2