From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-22 11:53:21
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> And no, using SF patch facility is a 100% sure way to get your patch ignored,
> because that's extremely inconvenient.
I can't understand this reaction. If the patch gets sent to the list
anyway, why is that any more inconvenient for you?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com