From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-19 17:24:26
Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
>> The arguments about "Jam" prefix is definitely a valid one. It would have to
>> relearn this convention, but new users might benefit. Anybody else care to
>> comment on this UI issue? Should we use Jamroot or project-root.jam?
>
> I prefer files that have an extension. Don't really care that much about
> the name though :-)
>
> Extensions make MIME types, CVS, editors, IDS, etc. behave reasonably.
Oh, good point. But then, we should change the name of Jamfile too.
file.jam
??? ;^)
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com