From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-29 13:03:13
Eric Niebler wrote:
>
> That's too complicated for such a simple thing. I could just add my own
> overloads of boost::std_min and boost::std_max for unsigned int. I don't
> even have to limit their existence to the Borland toolset. I'll check
> it in ASAP to unwedge the Borland build.
>
> Thanks.
>
I meant "unsigned long" instead of "unsigned int".
OK, I've checked in the fix. I limited the fix to the Borland toolset
after all. If someone with Borland installed can run a quick sanity
check, that'd be great.
Thanks.
-- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com