From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-27 09:29:00
Ali Azarbayejani wrote:
> I'd definitely like to tighten this up...as I've mentioned before, your
> first example below has been messing me up (foo/bar either file or
> target in directory foo).
I think we've never finished discussion that issue --- IIRC I've asked a
couple of questions. As for
foo/bar@/boost/filesystem/filesystem
syntax: unless Dave is -1, I'll remove support for it when I get back to
Boost.Build hacking next time. So we'll have
foo/bar
for regular filesystem paths and
@/boost/filesystem
for project ids. And no other cases.
- Volodya