From: Richard Smith (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-31 12:25:38


David Abrahams wrote:

> Richard Smith <richard_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > The gcc-tools documentation suggests that doing
> >
> >   bjam -sGXX=g++-3.2.1
> >
> > ought to do the right thing, however it appears not to.
>
> It's a known issue.  The workaround is [...]

Thanks, that works fine now.

Is there any reason why it wouldn't be safe to fix it with
something like the patch in my previous email? Just
curious.

Thanks,

Richard Smith