From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-16 03:07:15
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>I guess
>>
>> bjam dir1/foo.o
>>
>>is something rare, so we should not bother supporting it.
>>
>
>
> I use "bjam foo.o" (without the dir) quite frequently to look at the
> result of preprocessing the file.
Without the dir, this is quite common desire. I was merely saying that
we might not bother to support this *with* dir.
> I have to add manually add compiler flags for this, of course...
Hmm... I guess some feature might be introduces specially for that. I'll
note this.
- Volodya