From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-28 15:31:24
On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 03:30 PM, Toon Knapen wrote:
>
> When referring to the prebuilt jam executables, I would refer to them as
> jamboost instead of just jam. Otherwise, people might think that a
> perforce jam executable will do also.
>
I've been calling that Boost Jam or Boost.Jam. The only reason that this
mailing list came out named as it did was because Yahoo told me all of
the obvious names were unavailable.
That said, if everyone likes the idea of Jamboost, I'm amenable.
-Dave