From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-10-18 03:31:26
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 7:22 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If we want Boost to stay in the game, it has to adapt its offering to
> be more friendly and seamless with std library vocabulary types. Peter
> has already done much of this work, making boost::error_code
> seamlessly interoperable with std::error_code (thanks for that!).
Should boost::shared_ptr be seamlessly interoperable with std::shared_ptr?
Why (or why not)?