Subject: Re: [ublas] Symmetric Matrix Adaptor Strangeness
From: Rob Patro (rob.patro_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-07 10:12:38
Nasos,
Indeed, these did help! Though I agree with those posts that the
iterator documentation needs to be more explicit. At least to me,
this implication (the symmetric adaptor behavior) of not using a
const iterator was not at all obvious. Thanks again for the help!
Cheers,
Rob
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 09:39:13AM -0400, Nasos Iliopoulos wrote:
>
> Rob,
> I think those posts may help,
>
> http://listarchives.boost.org/MailArchives/ublas/2010/05/4269.php
> http://listarchives.boost.org/MailArchives/ublas/2010/06/4326.php
>
> Best
> Nasos
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:39:20 -0400
> > From: rob.patro_at_[hidden]
> > To: ublas_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: [ublas] Symmetric Matrix Adaptor Strangeness
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've still made no headway on the bug I posted previously that deals
> > with iterating over the non-zero entries of a symmetric adapted
> > sparse matrix. Clearly there seems to be an issue with the adapting
> > of the iterators when the underlying type is a sparse matrix. Does
> > anyone have any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rob
> > _______________________________________________
> > ublas mailing list
> > ublas_at_[hidden]
> > http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> > Sent to: nasos_i_at_[hidden]
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
> _______________________________________________
> ublas mailing list
> ublas_at_[hidden]
> http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/ublas
> Sent to: rob.patro_at_[hidden]