Subject: Re: [ublas] Getting bit by ormqr.hpp
From: Jeremy Conlin (jeremit0_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-16 10:33:16
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Karl Meerbergen <
Karl.Meerbergen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Correction done.
>
> Karl Meerbergen wrote:
> > You are right of course. This should be corrected.
> >
> > Thanks for spotting this
> >
> > Karl
>
>
Thanks for the quick update. After thinking about this for an hour or so I
have another idea. What about testing something like:
if( transpose_flag != 'N' ){
transpose_flag = 'T'; // For single or double precision
transpose_flag = 'C'; // For complex
}
This would allow a templated function to use the same flag for both complex
and non-complex types, and have the binding sort it out. Would this bring
bad karma?
Thanks again,
Jeremy