From: Russ (c.r.coggrave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-22 23:32:40
Russ <c.r.coggrave <at> phasevision.com> writes:
>
> I would be grateful if someone could please clarify the interpretation of
> real_type as used in the uBlas code.
>
> Is it intended to indicate the type of the real component of a value, as
opposed
> to the type of the imaginary component?
>
> OR
>
> Is it intended to indicate a floating point number type?
On further analysis, it looks like the former.