From: Ivan Matek (libbooze_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-05-21 14:07:46
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 2:28 PM Joaquin M López Muñoz via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> You can see that X::foo is inlined while X::bar is not. This is the
> original
> reason why those member functions in candidate Boost.Bloom are added
> the "inline" bit, namely, to invite compilers to inline --though,
> admittedly,
> for very short functions this is hardly going to make a difference.
>
I see(that was one of my guesses :)), is there a reason to not use
BOOST_FORCEINLINE there like you do in other places?