From: Dominique Devienne (ddevienne_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-03-11 08:58:54
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 9:45 PM Jean-Louis Leroy via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > [...] handling of const-ness
> > `const` is supported.
Doesn't show the overloading part, but that's OK.
Quick question: Given the ability to return different (necessarily
related?) types
from the same open-method, can we say BOM allows co-variant return type?
Like virtual methods / polymorphism allows, just more flexible that
plain pointers?
Thanks, --DD