From: Ivan Matek (libbooze_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-01-20 21:48:24
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:32 PM Christian Mazakas via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hash2 has functions much slower than OpenSSL's implementations, which are
> all these behemoths written using hand-crafted assembly. But we're actively
> working on closing the gap.
>
>
I have a fear this discussion is gonna go offtopic, but I do think it is
important to remember that Hash2 was designed as framework for "binding"
user types with algorithms, with some default implementations of
algorithms.
So although I was not delighted it is much slower than alternatives there
it was much less problematic.
As for Unordered: My history knowledge is bad, but was not Unordered the
library that originally inspired C++11 unordered_map?
*First Release 1.36.0*
Are you talking about speed compared to antique Google hash map
implementations like google::dense_hash_map and google::sparse_hash_map?