From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2025-01-16 00:15:37
On 1/15/25 12:33, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
> The review of the proposed Decimal Number library by Matt Borland and
> Chris Kormanyos begins today and runs until 22nd Jan.
A quick question. Why are the UDLs not in a dedicated nested namespace,
e.g. boost::decimal::literals? This is a very useful convention
established by the standard library that allows to not import the entire
library namespace into the user's scope but only enable the literals.