From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-10-25 14:03:47
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 6:04 AM Dominique Devienne via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ...I was surprised when Vinnie didn't jump on this,
>
I think Boost is better off with async-mqtt5 than without it. In theory,
splitting a library up into a protocol library and an I/O library is
better engineering. However in the case of the MQTT protocol the heavy
lifting is by far in the I/O code with its retries and strategies for
implementing the QoS. And a review should evaluate the library we have, not
the library that we think it should be.
Thanks