From: Ruben Perez (rubenperez038_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-10-18 16:58:41
(CC-ing the list)
> >
> > I haven't looked at the implementation yet, but I'm assuming that
> > owning types are being used for a reason.
>
> You mean like ASIO buffers? Or vector? To std::move them around?
I mean that the current interface is using std::string (owning) as the
argument type for message payloads, which probably means that the
implementation will std::move the supplied buffer, so the user doesn't
need to keep it alive. My question was regarding the use of a
character type (like std::string) vs a blob type (like
std::vector<std::byte>), more than an owning vs. a non-woning type.
Now that you've mentioned it, most Asio-based libraries require the
user to keep the message payload alive for the duration of the
operation, in an attempt to minimize copying. So I will add this to my
list of questions for Ivica: is there a reason why you decided to use
an owning type for the message payload?
Regards,
Ruben.