From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-06-06 22:54:22
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:46 AM Sam Darwin via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ugh... shouldn't this be boost.org ?
> >
>
> That's not a typo. The URL is archives.boost.io. In the past, the download
> link has been on many other domains: sourceforge, bintray, jfrog, and so
> on. There is no expectation the download is hosted on the website itself.
> Currently, 50TB/month of traffic are already going to archives.boost.io
> and
> would "break" (so to speak) if that were switched.
>
I agree that boost.org would be better. Where is the 50TB/month of traffic
coming from? We could make archive.boost.org point to the same server, no?
Having two domains for boost is just confusing IMO.