From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-03-13 09:04:06
El 12/03/2024 a las 22:28, Robert Ramey via Boost escribió:
> Enough of the web site exists so that it's clear what it would be like.
> The authors of this work deserve a yes or no answer as to whether it's
> going to be accepted or not. That is the purpose of the Boost Review.
> It's an onerous process. Many library authors have declined to submit
> themselves to it. It is a lot of work. But I think on balance the
> Boost review process is the secret of Boosts success. For something as
> central to Boost as this web site, the review process should be applied.
>
> I'm asking the Board of Directors to impose this requirement if its not
> already clear that it's necessary.
I've mentioned several times: an imposition is not desirable, it won't
work and it would be a failure as a community.
We (developers, maintainers, review managers) should take the
responsibility, or this project has no sense because there is no Boost
community.
I volunteered for the review management but if we have more talented
volunteers they're welcome.
Mathew, can we have a tentative schedule? I think we don't have anything
in the pipeline, we could start pretty soon if desired...
Best,
Ion